Thoughts on Celebrating Halloween as a Christian

As Christians, there are some things that we’re going to disagree about. For example, Nazarenes are teetotalers while Presbyterians are not. Credobaptists baptize adults while pedobaptists baptize infants of professing parents. Everyone seems to have his or her own ideas about observing the Sabbath. Although we don’t agree with each other on every subject, we are all united by our faith in the risen savior.

Around this time of year, the subject of Halloween and Christianity inevitably comes up. Some Christians decide not to celebrate at all, refusing to participate in paganism, witchcraft, or at worst, Satanism.

Back in the day, the Celts would celebrate Samhain as an end to the summer and the beginning of the fall/winter season. They also believed that the ‘barrier’ to the ‘other world’ was particularly thin that night, and that spirits could get in and out. Hence the costumes — have to disguise yourself from evil spirits, you know.

Personally, I believe that’s globbedy-gloop. I don’t believe in ghosts or spirits that move in and out of our world. So why then would I celebrate a pagan holiday based upon that belief?

Why do non-Christians celebrate Christmas? Christmas began as a way to celebrate the birth of Christ, but it has split into two celebrations. There’s the secular holiday full of eggnog and Christmas trees and Santa Claus and dinners with the In-Laws, and there’s the religious holiday that does all of that while focusing on Jesus. Some people celebrate only the frivolity of the season, while others make Christ the center of every Christmas tradition.

And that’s fine.

Halloween has become a cultural holiday as well. I’m sure there are many people gearing up to welcome the spirits they believe will be crossing over, but I’m busy putting the finishing touches on my kid’s costume because angels really should have glittery wings. I also need to figure out what I’m bringing to the Halloween party tomorrow night, where friends will gather for fellowship and too much candy.

I’m busy stocking up on Tums to deal with the tummy aches after consuming too much of that candy.

I celebrate the fun and frivolous cultural side of Halloween, not the day of the dead. And that’s fine.

Happy (Frivolous) Halloween!

The Liberal Agenda Will Destroy the Democratic Majority

We are now days away from voting in a Republican majority in the House, and quite possibly the Senate too. With the approval ratings in the tank for our top politicians, it’s not difficult to understand why Americans are saying, “Change it back!”

Democrats are doing their best to distance themselves from Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi. In a campaign ad for Earl Pomeroy, Democrat incumbent for North Dakota’s lone House seat, he states:

I’m not Nancy Pelosi, I’m not Barack Obama; I’m Earl Pomeroy … My values are formed right here in Valley City where I grew up … I know I’ve disappointed you with a vote here or there, but you can always count on the fact that I do what I do for the right reason, for the people of North Dakota. Thanks for the chance.

After not being endorsed by the President for his bid to become Rhode Island’s next governor, Democratic candidate Frank Caprio told a Providence radio station:

I never asked President Obama for his endorsement and what’s going on here is really Washington insider politics at its worst — he can take his endorsement and really shove it as far as I am concerned.

Countless other Democrats hoping to be elected next Tuesday are distancing themselves from this administration’s job-killing policy of tax-and-spend.

It’s easy to understand why Democrats don’t want to be associated with Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, or the rest of them. Since their party was voted into majority in 2006, and especially since 2008 when Obama was elected, we’ve seen spending spiral out of control, restrictive laws being passed against the will of the majority of Americans, and in just about two months, we’re in for thelargest tax increase in U.S. history.

Democrats are going to lose their majority because they won’t listen to us. Because they think they know better. They’ll let us come along for the ride, but we’d better shut up and sit in the back.

We asked them to read the bill, and they said no. They said it had to be passed before we could find out what’s in it. They laughed at us and said there was no point in reading it, because only lawyerscould understand it.

One legislator that worries about Guam tipping over voted on the health care bill that would take over 1/6 of our economy. That’s right, someone outside the realm of mental stability is voting on bills that will affect every citizen in our country.

Spending packages flew through Congress — auto bailouts, bank bailouts, and the takeover of the student loan industry. Let’s not forget the robotic bees: 10% unemployment, but by golly, let’s spend some money to develop a colony of robotic bees. That will make everything better (insert eye roll here).

The health care bill passed into law, and as Vice President Biden said, it was a “big fucking deal.” And since then we’ve seen coverage to children droppedspecial deals cut to large corporations,breastfeeding moms discriminated againstmenstruating women discriminated against, and women dying from breast cancer discriminated against.

Democrats might be trying to distance themselves from the liberal agenda, but it’s just too little too late.

Cross-Posted at The Stir

Candidate Misses the Mark With Pro-Life Political Ad

I am pro-life. I believe that abortion ends a human life. I do not think that showing people pictures of aborted fetuses helps our cause.

Missy Smith is running for D.C. delegate to the U.S. House, and she had two abortions that she now regrets. “I was told it’s not a baby. They lied to me,” she says in a controversial campaign ad. She continues, “And believe me I am angry. My heart has been ripped out. ObamaPelosiReidNorton – they all support the murder of babies and the abuse of women by abortion. It’s time to make child killing illegal again.”

I don’t have a problem with this message, and my heart breaks for Missy Smith and others that have suffered abortions by ignorance. I believe that many women are lied to about the development of their babies in utero. Planned Parenthood has been caught lying to women about the development of their babies. In the early stages of pregnancy, it’s easy to suffer from out-of-sight, out-of-mind syndrome. Most women don’t feel their babies moving or even look remotely pregnant until well into the second trimester, when a baby is potentially viable outside of the womb.

A law passed recently in Oklahoma allows a woman to see her baby on ultrasound before making the decision to have an abortion. Some people might think this is cruel, but I think it’s empowering. Isn’t knowledge power? The bill doesn’t outlaw abortion; it just allows women to make the most informed decision possible.

No matter what side of the issue you stand on, there is no denying that abortion is violent. It’s so violent and against our human nature as women that Abby Johnson resigned from her position as the director of a Bryan, Texas, Planned Parenthood last year after watching an ultrasound of an abortion being performed.

The problem I have with Ms. Smith’s campaign ad is the use of images of aborted babies. Tiny and broken limbs are a devastating fact of abortion, but bombarding the public with these images helps no one. Pro-lifers are well aware of the crushing effects of abortion, and the pictures needlessly upset women that have already had abortions.

The worst thing that a picture of an aborted fetus does is shut down dialogue and discussion with people that consider themselves pro-choice yet anti-abortion. We can have an intelligent and reasonable discussion about the science of life and the results of choosing to have sex (even with protection), but a bloody image immediately turns people off and puts up a wall.

I appreciate Missy Smith’s attempt to inject the truth of human-hood into the abortion debate, but I doubt this ad will convince many people to champion fetus rights.

Cross-Posted at The Stir

Prop 19: Should Marijuana Be Legal in California?

In less than two weeks, California voters will have an opportunity tolegalize marijuana (at least at the state level) for recreational use. If passed, proposition 19 would allow the state to regulate and tax the drug, which could be sold to adults ages 21 and up.

The arguments for prop 19 are fairly straightforward. It would generate massive amounts of money to put toward things like parks, schools, public safety, and bloated pensions for government employees. It would put police priorities in order, since hundreds of millions of dollars would no longer be spent arresting non-violent pot smokers.

Maybe the biggest argument for legalizing marijuana is that it would cut off funding to violent drug cartels across the border.

The arguments against prop 19 are clear-cut as well: We’re talking about legalizing a mind-altering, gateway drug. What’s next? Heroin? Coke? Are we headed down the proverbial slippery slope?

The libertarian streak in me wants to legalize pot. At first glance, I like the points for passing the proposition. Not to mention that I’m all about the personal freedom to make our own decisions, for better or for worse.

Upon further examination, I don’t like what I see in the legislation. I’m one of those crazy Tea Partypeople who actually thinks you should read a bill before voting on it, so read it and read about it I did.

It turns out that while pot sales would be taxable, it would be left up to each city or county to design its own system of regulation and taxation. Furthermore, dealers would not be required to pay the taxes to the state, because marijuana sales are still illegal at the federal level, and the Fifth Amendmentprotects us from self-incrimination.

Prop 19 would create a ‘legal quagmire‘ for employers across the state, as well as threaten public safety. There is no definition for what constitutes being under the influence of marijuana in the legislation. While smoking a joint on the job or behind the wheel is or could be prohibited, there is nothing preventing someone from lighting up before operating heavy machinery.

I even had one conservative friend say she would vote against the pot prop because it would kill the free (drug) market, wiping small sellers off the map and out of business. You know that we right-wingers love our free markets!

On a completely personal note, I think the best argument against legalizing weed is that California voters are already boneheaded enough. After all, we’ve been voting Barbara ‘Call Me Ma’am’ Boxer to the Senate for over two decades. We’re also responsible for Nancy Pelosi and one of the only true RINOs around – Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Maybe this whole thing is a moot point anyway. Our farmers can’t even get any water to their crops. Not even cannabis can grow without a little H2O.

What do you think? Should pot be legalized?

Cross-Posted at The Stir

Government Waste on the New Jersey Turnpike

In a perfect world, we’d all be kabillionaires. We’d all go to work and do something beneficial to mankind, like cure AIDS or breed cats that stayed adorable little kittens forever. Our children would all be on the honor roll, we’d all have 17 pairs of Manolo Blahniks, and our personal chefs would create delicious low-fat meals for us.

That’s fantasy. This is planet Earth. No one ever said life was fair, or easy, or even that you’d get what you deserved. Life has actually been pretty crappy for most people in history. Thankfully, today in America our biggest problems seem to be whether or not everyone should have to pay for doctors’ medical expertise.

We Americans have pretty much been left alone to flourish, and flourish we have. We have gone from a land of immigrant misfits to the biggest, baddest nation on the planet, and no, I will not apologize for it. Somebody has to be the best, why not us?

Capitalism isn’t perfect. It is flawed. But it does something that socialism doesn’t do. It takes into account basic human nature. We are flawed. We all want the best for ourselves, whether that means an Ivy League education and the corner office, or 2.7 beautiful, perfectly mannered children with your gorgeous lawyer husband that fixes up the house on the weekends.

In America, if you’re willing to work hard, make some sacrifices, and take a risk or two, there’s a high probability you will achieve your goal. But you have to work for it. People don’t just fall into primo jobs without working their way up the ladder, and children don’t behave unless they are taught to behave.

There’s no guarantee of everything coming up roses, but there’s the chance it will. This is uniquely American. Until our country came around, the idea that the government was there to protect our God-given rights, not decide what they were, people stayed in the same station they were born into. There was no opportunity for them to pursue a different life like there has been in the United States. Abraham Lincoln, the man that held a divided nation together with intelligence and grace, was born in a log cabin in the backwoods of Illinois, for Pete’s sake.

This genius system begins to break down when the government takes our money and wastes it. Of course we need things like roads and cops and super buff firemen. But do we need the New Jersey Turnpike Authority to waste $43 million on perks and bonuses?

According to reports,

The audit says that toll dollars From [sic] the New Jersey Turnpike and the Garden State Parkway were spent on items ranging from an employee bowling league to employee bonuses for working on birthdays and holidays.

It took place as tolls were being increased.

The biggest expense uncovered in the audit was $30 million in unjustified bonuses to employees and management in 2008 and 2009 without consideration of performance.

One example was paying employees overtime for removing snow and working holidays and then giving additional “snow removal bonuses” and “holiday bonuses.”

In a perfect world, everyone would get a snow removal bonus. But this is reality, and in reality, you can’t get something from nothing. The money for the government employees’ bowling leagues and ridiculous bonuses came out of our pockets — money that could’ve been spent on soccer uniforms or Manolos or fancy wine.

It’s easy to say that everyone deserves the best in life. It’s another thing to pay for someone else to have it.

Cross-Posted on The Stir

Jenny Erikson Radio Show – Episode 0006

Conservative Chick Chat with Lori Ziganto, Jenn Q. Public, and Rebecca Grunewald.

Jenny Erikson Radio Show – Episode 0005

John Hawkins of Right Wing News joins me to discuss polygamy, pot, Republican mean girls, and the tea party.

Who Funds Those Crazy Tea Party Candidates? America Does!

Remember that hit piece on the Tea Party in The New Yorker a few months ago? The whole thing basically said that the billionaire Koch brothers are funding the Tea Party movement. I’m still waiting for my check, by the way.

Lefty liberals know they can’t ignore us crazy conservatives, so they do their best to discredit us. Rachel Maddow calls us tea-baggersBill Clinton likens us to domestic terrorists. The NAACP calls us a hate group (which is interesting coming from a group that supposedly fights for equality). President Obama warns of the darker aspects of the Tea Party — and in Rolling Stone magazine, no less!

Liberals love to mock us and positively giggle with excitement over coming up with such eloquent insults as “Mashed up bag of meat with lipstick.” So clever! They insult us in an attempt to convince themselves and all 27 MSNBC viewers that we’re a radical fringe group funded by Wall Street Republicans. Because all those rich New Yorkers with houses in the Hamptons are Republicans (insert eye roll here).

Nancy Pelosi assumes we’re Astroturf because she doesn’t know anything different. In the liberal world,protesters are paid to show up to rallies. Their hearts are not even in it enough to clean up after themselves. Democrats assume that Tea Party candidates like Marco RubioSharron AngleJoe Miller, and even Christine O’Donnell are funded by rich Republican interest groups (which is really funny considering that those four won their primaries despite the GOP establishment backing their opponents) because they win their races with big union money.

The left cannot imagine a world where real live human beings care enough about their country and their future to come together of their own accord to make their voices heard. That we’re coming together to financially support the candidates we want representing us. SEIU or UAW does not back our candidates; we back our candidates.

From CBS News:

Typically, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Senate candidates get no more than 20 percent of their funds from small donors. But the latest numbers available from the Federal Elections Commission for some Tea Party favorites show much higher stats.

Ed Morrissey sums it up nicely over at HotAir.com:

This appears to negate the notion that the Tea Party is a corporate-driven movement. This shows that the Tea Party is a true grassroots movement, one with a significant amount of power.

They want to pretend that we don’t exist, and they can go on living their elitist little lives where they tell us what to do and what to eat and where to go to school and how much water we can have. They have no idea that we’re the majority, and in two weeks we’re taking the first step to restoring honor, freedom, and independence.

Happy Election Day. It’s going to be a good one.

Cross Posted at The Stir

The Slippery Slope of Death

When you begin to devalue human life, where do you stop? When a fetus isn’t a person, is an infant a person? Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer doesn’t differentiate between the born and unborn, and proudly says that he’d kill a baby if it were in the best interest of the family. Eugenics, anyone?

At the other end of life is assisted suicide, which I vehemently oppose. I think Million Dollar Baby is the stupidest movie ever. If you haven’t seen it yet, don’t bother. The chick overcomes tremendous obstacles to become a champion, then becomes a quadriplegic. She begs her mentor to kill her, and in an “act of mercy” he does. It didn’t even make sense for the character. The girl who triumphs over every challenge that life throws at her is not going to give up on life because her body doesn’t work the way it used to.

God puts us somewhere because that’s where He wants us to be, and to play god is to tell Him that He’s wrong. Guess what? We don’t know everything. God does. This is why I never, ever pray for patience. I know that He will give me opportunities to learn it, and having very little to begin with, I don’t have the patience to learn patience.

I heard about Dignitas awhile ago and was appalled but not surprised. The Swiss clinic exists solely to kill people. Excuse me, I mean transition people gently from one side of life to the next. Bull hockey. Death is death is death is death, and it sucks. There may be a small amount of comfort in knowing that someone is in a better place, but really, our lives here are left with holes in them.

So Dignitas expedites the process of dying, leaving an emotional mess of a loved one behind. Rather than going on living, the death clinic is now trying to legalize assisted suicide for the brokenhearted relatives left behind after they helped kill off a beloved family member.

Swiss suicide clinic Dignitas has called for the healthy partners of chronically ill euthanasia patients to be allowed to kill themselves too.

Clinic head Ludwig Minelli has called for suicide drug cocktails to be made legally available to the heartbroken relatives who have just helped their loved ones end their own lives.

‘Relatives should also be allowed to have a prescription for suicide drugs even when they are not terminally ill,’ Minelli told Swiss newspaper Blick Sonntag.

The family suicide kits would be illegal under current Swiss law where assisted euthanasia is only legal for those suffering from terminal illness of incurable chronic medical conditions.

Is that sick and twisted or what? And here’s the problem I have with it: When we start devaluing human life, when does it end? Who gets to decide when a baby is a baby or when terminal is terminal? Who decides that someone in a vegetative state doesn’t want to go on living, even when her mere presence brings joy to others? Who decides when your life becomes inconvenient?

Why even head down that slippery slope?

Bailouts, Short Sales, and Unemployment: The Vicious Cycle of a Downward Economy

A few months ago, I overheard someone discussing selling their home and buying a new one. She was lamenting the fact that they were doing a short sale, selling the house for less than they bought it for. The woman and her friend then proceeded to moan and groan about the buyer who was “stealing” their equity money.

Wait, what? Who is actually the thief in this situation? When you buy a house, you agree to pay a certain amount of money for it. The couple doing the short sale has dishonored that commitment, thereby “stealing” money from the bank. The new couple has not yet broken any financial promises.

When thinking about the housing market in 2010, words like short saleforeclosures, and upside down mortgages come to mind. Remember back in the early 2000s, when you could buy a house with no equity, hold on to it for a couple of months, then flip it and cash out thousands in equity?

Maybe that ease of purchase is exactly what led to the rapidly declining real estate market. What’s to make someone hold on to a home when they have nothing invested in it? Easy come; easy go, as they say.

Once a few people realized they were in over their heads with their massive mortgages, they dumped them onto the market and moved into housing more within their means. With a dramatic increase in the number of houses on the market, the overall value of homes continued to decline.

Inflation continues to rise, and more people are filing for unemployment benefits than ever before. A few years ago, people could open a home equity line of credit to cover their living costs, but now they must find other ways to make ends meet. Employers aren’t excited to hire anyone right now; they’re trying to figure out how many people they’re going to be able to keep on board with new health insurance mandates and the biggest tax increase in history right around the corner.

Many people, like the woman I overheard, are dumping their homes on the market, while the banks pick up the tab. Ever heard of the bank bailouts? Taxpayer dollars are bailing out the banks that bailed out irresponsible homebuyers.

It’s a vicious cycle that can only be stopped by believing in people and encouraging them to be responsible. As we’ve seen, bailouts only enable those who take advantage of the system. Our economy is an intricate yet simple machine, but the cogs aren’t turning right now. Let’s bring back the concept of personal responsibility and restore America to the land of freedom, integrity, and opportunity once more.

Cross Posted at The Stir