Anchor Babies

Everyone’s talking about anchor babies. Ann Coulter. John Boehner. Texans.

Anchor babies are the children born to illegal immigrants on U.S. soil, and therefore United States citizens, entitled to all of the rights and privileges thereof. Education, health care, and other expensive stuff.

The debate of birthright citizenship comes out of the 14th amendment, which reads (in part):

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The point of it was to grant citizenship to newly freed slaves, but over the last 150ish years, it’s morphed into an invitation for about-to-be mamas to circumvent a messed up immigration system and plant some baby leg roots in the United States.

I do not have an opinion on whether or not birthright citizenship is Constitutional. But there’s no denying that it’s a drain on our resources.

I propose that we stop fighting about the 14th amendment, strengthen border security, and end welfare.

There. Anchor baby *problem* solved.

See how easy that was?

The Tale of Two Summer Vacations

I know I’m late to the game to add my two cents to the Obama-vacay-in-Spain-water-cooler-talk. I’ve been busy living the glam life with Brittany Cohan in Wisconsin.

Or at least the relaxed life. I left the kids at home.

This is my summer vacation.

A $393.89 plane ticket purchased with reward points. An awesome friend with a guest room. A low-key Sunday spent in pajamas, on the couch, watching chick flicks and reading about Sookie Stackhouse, and drinking a little too much cheap wine.

It’s not Hawaii, but times are tight. And it’s not like it’s going to get easier anytime soon, what with the largest tax increase in history coming up in mere months.

It’s Wisconsin for me, because that what my budget allows for. It’s not a lavish hotel in Spain, where Michelle and one of her daughters vacationed over the weekend. Which I really wouldn’t care about under ordinary circumstances. They have money. Great. Fantastic. They should spend it however they want. Beauty of America and all that jazz.

Except that the majority of the trip’s cost was covered by Mr. & Mrs. Taxpayer. Almost $150,000 for transportation costs alone. Michelle apparently paid for her own hotel room, but America paid for the lavish lodging of her security detail at the Ritz-Carlton. Who knows how many other associated costs were paid for by you and me?

So let me get this straight: My taxes are going up so that Michelle can quite literally have tea with the Queen of Spain while I’m drinking a $4 bottle of wine in Wisconsin?

Is anyone else scratching their head?

Cover the extra costs yourself, First Family, or come on over to Wisconsin. I’ll even pour you a glass of cheap wine.

Unwilling Flasher Sues ‘Girls Gone Wild’ … And Loses

Recently a jury denied a young woman’s claim that Girls Gone Wild had damaged her reputation by filming her dancing at a bar and having her top pulled down. The woman had been suing the company for $5 million in damages, including the estimated $1.5 million made off the video Girls Gone Wild Sorority Orgy.

Classy.

The jury foreman, Patrick O’Brien, said, “Through her actions, she gave implied consent … She was really playing to the camera. She knew what she was doing.”

The young woman, now a married mother of two daughters, claimed that she had been having fun until her top was pulled down. Her attorney, Stephen Evans, also argued that she could be heard in the original footage saying “no” to a request to show off her boobies.

Read More

Pamela Gorman Day!

This Thursday is Pamela Gorman day over at From the Right Radio. What does this mean? You should read the press release:

Aug 03, 2010 – FTR Radio announced this morning that Thursday, August 5th will be Pamela Gorman Day. Gorman, a former Arizona State Senator, is running for Congress in Arizona’s 3rd District. FTR Radio will dedicate much of its programming Thursday to all things Pamela Gorman.

Thomas LaDuke, Programming Director at FTR Radio said , “We will play interviews with Senator Gorman, as well as spin her favorite music and share some of her best cooking recipes. Senator Gorman is the type of no-nonsense conservative that we need in Congress and we are happy to dedicate Thursday to her.”

“Pamela Gorman is a fighter. I am excited to have FTR Radio dedicate a day to a true conservative-and Pamela Gorman is the right person to send to Congress,” said Paul Croteau, Director of Operations at FTR Radio.

To listen to Pamela Gorman Day on FTR Radio, go to www.ftrradio.com. For more information on Pamela Gorman, visit www.gorman2010.com.

Of course yours truly will be playing an interview with Pamela on In Her Right Mind at 4 P.M. Eastern time.

The Smart Girl Report – Episode 0039

Smart Girl Spotlight on Ashley Sewell, Conservative Chick Chat with Congresswoman Cathy McMorris-Rodgers, and cocktails with Mike G.

Racists & Misogynists: Can We Please Leave Skin Color & Gender Out of It?

Being black does not excuse bad behavior. If a person lies, cheats, steals, or stomps on their neighbor’s flowers, it should not be excused because of that person’s skin color. Likewise, investigating black people on corruption charges does not make someone a racist.

These seem like simple enough concepts to grasp; yet some lawmakers are crying racist over the ethics violation charges being brought against Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and Maxine Waters (D-CA).

The two members of the Congressional Black Caucus (side note — if there’s a black caucus, shouldn’t there be white, brown, purple polka-dotted, and yellow-bellied caucuses as well?) are being formally charged with behavior unbecoming of a member of congress, let alone a decent human being.

Rangel is being charged on 13 counts of ethics violations including tax evasion and using his congressional staff and letterhead to solicit potential donors to the Rangel Center.

During the 2008 banking crisis, Waters intervened with the Treasury Department to benefit a small bank. A bank in which her husband held more $250,000 in stock. Nothing shady about that at all.

Both members of congress chose not to settle with House ethics investigators, as doing so would involve admissions of guilt. After all, it’s difficult to maintain that I-care-about-the-little-people facade when you’re hiding hundreds of thousands of dollars from the IRS or screwing over businesses to benefit your own family.

Read More

Brutality and Subjugation: The Women of Islam at Home and Abroad

Talk is cheap. I’ve heard a lot of talk about the Islamic faith in the past several years. I’ve heard everything from Muslims are pure evil to Muslims are the embodiment of all that is good and pure in the world.

As with most things pertaining to a group of people sharing a religion, I believe the truth about Muslims lies somewhere between the two extremes. Like Christianity, Judaism, or any other religion, there will be followers across the spectrum.

But one thing that most, if not all, Muslims share is the mistreatment of women. From subtle derogation to death by stoning, it is clear that Muslim women are not held in the same regard as Muslim men in the Islamic world.

It’s hard to ignore the cover of Time magazine this week, which features the haunting picture of teenage Aisha. Aisha had her ears and nose cut off by her husband last year, under the order of a Taliban judge. Her crime? Running away from her husband’s family because she was being beaten nearly to death.

But that’s the Taliban – the terrorist group following the strictest interpretation of Sharia (Islamic) law. What about more moderate Muslims?

Even moderate Muslim women are to live under the control of their husbands, fathers, or male guardians, no matter how harsh it may be.

I talked to a young Iraqi woman named Rafraf Barrak who told me the tale of being locked in a closet for four months because she had dared to eat her lunch with a boy. I asked her if, during that time, did she understand how wrong it was to be treated that way, or did she view it as just punishment for her actions?

Growing up there [in Iraq], I knew it was a punishment. I knew that what I was doing was wrong because there’s [sic] rules and … traditions and you don’t break them… It wasn’t that my dad hated me; it was just his way of disciplining me.

I’d be willing to bet that the boy did not receive the same punishment.

Read More